|
|
Saturday, March 08, 2003The end of non-proliferation? TIME today reported that Iran is very close to completing a massive uranium enrichment plant near Natanz: The new discoveries could destabilize a region already dangerously on edge in anticipation of war in Iraq. Israel — which destroyed an Iraqi nuclear plant in Osirak in a 1981 raid — is deeply alarmed by the developments. "It's a huge concern," says one Israeli official. "Iran is a regime that denies Israel's right to exist in any borders and is a principal sponsor of Hezbollah. If that regime were able to achieve a nuclear potential it would be extremely dangerous." Israel will not take the "Osirak option" off the table, the official says, but "would prefer that this issue be solved in other ways." Iraq. North Korea. India. Pakistan. Israel. Now Iran. All of these nations have pursued a nuclear weapons program and have either succeeded or are in the process of obtaining the material necessary to succeed. Now there is an argument that circles the peacemongering crowd that these nations have a right to obtain WMD, if only for their own security. A great example of this is the difference between our foreign policy towards Iraq - whom we are about to crush - and North Korea, whom we are ready to appease. What is the difference? Its not because we were in Iraq first, nor is it because of energy reserves, money, elections, oil, powerlust, etc. The difference is the nuclear card. When Saddam threatens to burn the soil under the feet of the aggresors, the American public. But when Kim Jong-Il threatens to nuke New York City or Los Angeles, Americans get uneasy. It's not a lack of courage that does this. On the macro level, the malcontents of the world seem to have this illusion that if you punch the United States in the mouth hard enough, we'll back off. Osama cited this concerning our unwillingness to accept casualties, by using smart bombs, by withdrawing from Somolia in 1993, and today by using Afghan nationals as the main force in standing in our hunt for al-Qaeda operatives in Tora Bora. American resolve isn't what is being played against. Rather, what is being tested is our willigness to receive the minor casualties - the tragedies that one would see on CNN with husbands, wives, sons, and daughters rather than the statistical carnage of a nuclear bomb. This having been said, the being a member of the nuclear club has its privileges. It allows you to inflict the tragedies without accumulating them into a statistic. North Korea is playing a dangerous game of inflicting American diplomacy the death of a thousand small tragedies. In the post 9/11 world, every threat is taken seriously, and sabrerattling from Pyongyang is no different. Imagine then what a nuclear Saddam would be able to inflict upon the American psyche. Kill a few thousand Kurds? Tough luck. Invade Kuwait? What are we going to do about it. Place an iron boot on the throat of Israel? Turnabout is fair play. In short, American are obsessed about the dramatic tragedies that our press capitalizes on. Weapons of mass destruction in the wrong hands allows are enemies to undermine every policy action we take. Rather than dealing with tyrants as they should be, our generation - the first American generation never to have fought a war - must appease dictators and tyrants alike as equals, for God forbid that American lives ever be lost in a theater or war. When the bombs start falling in Iraq, be very certain that there will be American casualties. The American press will blaze headlines about the families whose loved ones will be lost. American resolve to handle the small causalties will be tested. But no where will there be a mention of the statistical nightmare prevented - only every attempt for the shortsighted and the cynical to capitalize on others suffering, the new American economy of Oprahfication. Perhaps this is the biggest complaint I have about the anti-war movement concerning WMD. If we are not willing to accept the minor casualties to prevent the larger ones, is nuclear proliferation - and the politics of nuclear blackmail that we are experiencing in North Korea - the future of the world? Will our children live in a world where rouge nations blackmail others into compliance? Rather than the divide between the rich and poor, will we endlessly debate about the divide between the nuclear and the pacifist? War is the last option of politics. But as Von Clausewitz so carefully observed, "(t)he war of a community—of whole nations and particularly of civilised nations—always starts from a political condition, and is called forth by a political motive. It is therefore a political act." The political condition today is one arrived at by Saddam alone - not by the UN, nor by the United States and the United Kingdom. For twelve long years, Saddam had the capacity to disarm, and has obstinately refused though deception, deceit, and misleading evidence. The world of nuclear blackmail that we are tasting in North Korea must not duplicate itself in Iraq. If Saddam Hussein insists on pursing a course of war, if he is willing to place the Iraqi people in harms way to pursue those aims, then we as Americans must be willing to endure the small tragedies of war in order to prevent the statistical carnage of nuclear holocaust. The argument is no more simply put than that.
|
|
JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?1) John Brownlee2) Ken Cuccinelli AboutShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.ContactThe Jeffersoniad
ArchivesMarch 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 April 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009
|
|
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Home