global inequality essay apa pengertian viagra college application essay definition see url example of dialogue in an essay cialis green lane ww2 research follow levitra clayville red viagra benefits write my homework chper essay on my hobby in english for class 6 enter source link follow site free math homework help onde comprar viagra brasilia research papers service paper phobia sample thesis defense questions how can i know my ip address in android see source site annotation essay ACLU Attacks Councilman Turner

Now this sort of crap really gets me. Councilman Hashmel Turner received a letter from the ACLU notifying him that his prayer at the beginning of the council session was illegal – specifically because he mentions Jesus Christ:

Ironically, the letter’s author, Kent Willis, Virginia director of the ACLU, is a Fredericksburg resident who said he voted for Turner in the last election.

Willis said such prayers at public meetings are not uncommon.

“I’d say about half the elected bodies in Virginia probably open with an invocation, and many of them use sectarian prayers,” Willis said.

And this can be particularly true of elected officials who are religious leaders.

“They are by their occupation inclined to render sectarian prayers,” he said. “This has happened over and over during the last 15 years.”

But, Willis said, “It’s one of those issues where there is no ambiguity.”

What many people may not know, however, is that prayer, in and of itself, is not verboten in public settings.

What crap. I am a firm believer in the Public Square, or the idea that all beliefs should be welcomed and discussed on their merits regardless of their claims. For instance, if Councilman Tom Fortune decided to offer a Bhuddist prayer at council meetings, I would have no problems with that because those are his beliefs and they should be respected, not hidden away. So long as City Council isn’t establishing one religion over another (e.g. by saying that only Bhuddist prayers should be offered) then I completely disagree with the position of the ACLU.

Since Council is so fond of defending itself in court agianst a myriad of allegations, why not allow Councilman Turner to challenge the ruling on the basis of the 1st Amendment’s non-restriction of religion? Surely “Congress can make no law,” but we are talking about expression – not enshrinement.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.