<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Shaun Kenney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shaunkenney.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shaunkenney.com</link>
	<description>Politics &#38; Religion in Virginia&#039;s Public Square</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:05:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should You Donate to Children&#8217;s Wish Foundation?  (I Didn&#8217;t &#8212; Here&#8217;s Why) by Barb</title>
		<link>http://shaunkenney.com/2011/01/should-you-donate-to-childrens-wish-foundation-i-didnt-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-9417</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaunkenney.com/?p=9915#comment-9417</guid>
		<description>My daughter is awaiting a wish from this organization and I am begining to wonder if it is logitt&gt; could anyone help me out. She was accepted for a wish a few months ago and have heard nothing back from them since we submitted all of our information.  As long as it takes for them to fufill the wishes of some of these children (parden me for saying this) they may have passed on  by then. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My daughter is awaiting a wish from this organization and I am begining to wonder if it is logitt&gt; could anyone help me out. She was accepted for a wish a few months ago and have heard nothing back from them since we submitted all of our information.  As long as it takes for them to fufill the wishes of some of these children (parden me for saying this) they may have passed on  by then. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should You Donate to Children&#8217;s Wish Foundation?  (I Didn&#8217;t &#8212; Here&#8217;s Why) by Shaun Kenney</title>
		<link>http://shaunkenney.com/2011/01/should-you-donate-to-childrens-wish-foundation-i-didnt-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-9414</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Kenney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaunkenney.com/?p=9915#comment-9414</guid>
		<description>Jayme -- 

Let me go out on a limb here and say that not only should that caller have been fired, but the firm should have been released and the bad press that has been accumulated by CWF for their fundraising &quot;activities&quot; be examined by an auditor. 

Extensively.

There are some organizations that I simply refuse to help or be a part of due to personal ethics.  CWF has all the hallmarks of being one of those organizations... and that&#039;s a shame, not because of CWF, but because there are some great organizations out there that really are doing some good that have their reputations tarnished by organizations such as CWF -- and that&#039;s a shame, because there are families who really do need the help Make-A-Wish Foundation provides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jayme &#8212; </p>
<p>Let me go out on a limb here and say that not only should that caller have been fired, but the firm should have been released and the bad press that has been accumulated by CWF for their fundraising &#8220;activities&#8221; be examined by an auditor. </p>
<p>Extensively.</p>
<p>There are some organizations that I simply refuse to help or be a part of due to personal ethics.  CWF has all the hallmarks of being one of those organizations&#8230; and that&#8217;s a shame, not because of CWF, but because there are some great organizations out there that really are doing some good that have their reputations tarnished by organizations such as CWF &#8212; and that&#8217;s a shame, because there are families who really do need the help Make-A-Wish Foundation provides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NCR: Of Rosa DeLauro and Other Disoriented Catholics by Shaun Kenney</title>
		<link>http://shaunkenney.com/2012/04/ncr-of-rosa-delauro-and-other-disoriented-catholics/comment-page-1/#comment-9413</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Kenney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaunkenney.com/?p=10308#comment-9413</guid>
		<description>Interestingly enough -- your first paragraph aside -- I completely agree with everything you&#039;ve said here.

Rerum Novarum and Catholic Social Justice theory are favorite topics of mine... and yet, you&#039;ll find that Leo XIII and subsequent popes all uniformly rejected socialism.  Efforts to conflate socialism with Catholic social theory falls flat at every turn... and it has little do to with the &quot;conservative&quot; nature of the Church.  Rather, it has much more to do with a rejection of political systems and an embrace of true faith and charity over false faith and material handouts.

I completely share your antipathy with Ayn Rand.  Weigel&#039;s critique of DeLauro remains very apt, for the same reasons you cite in criticizing the more objectivist leanings of Ryan -- political Catholicism is not Catholicism at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly enough &#8212; your first paragraph aside &#8212; I completely agree with everything you&#8217;ve said here.</p>
<p>Rerum Novarum and Catholic Social Justice theory are favorite topics of mine&#8230; and yet, you&#8217;ll find that Leo XIII and subsequent popes all uniformly rejected socialism.  Efforts to conflate socialism with Catholic social theory falls flat at every turn&#8230; and it has little do to with the &#8220;conservative&#8221; nature of the Church.  Rather, it has much more to do with a rejection of political systems and an embrace of true faith and charity over false faith and material handouts.</p>
<p>I completely share your antipathy with Ayn Rand.  Weigel&#8217;s critique of DeLauro remains very apt, for the same reasons you cite in criticizing the more objectivist leanings of Ryan &#8212; political Catholicism is not Catholicism at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NCR: Of Rosa DeLauro and Other Disoriented Catholics by Dan</title>
		<link>http://shaunkenney.com/2012/04/ncr-of-rosa-delauro-and-other-disoriented-catholics/comment-page-1/#comment-9406</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 18:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaunkenney.com/?p=10308#comment-9406</guid>
		<description>You may want to consider the possibility that some of the Catholics you attack so casually may be far more in line with the teaching of the Catholic church than Congressman Ryan is. Well meaning though he may be. This may be inconvenient when you are trying to reconcile church teaching with some of your political views, but questioning one&#039;s own assumptions and motivations is a very healthy thing. And it usually results in a far more honest case being made by the individual going forward. And one that is more persuasive because it is both more honest and more consistent.

I always thought it rather odd for Congressman Ryan (or any Catholic for that matter) to base his economic or political views on the works of Ayn Rand. Not because she was an atheist. Not even because of her open hostility toward the church and religion in general. But because so much of her philosophy is completely antithetical to what the Catholic church teaches us.

As a young man, I read an encyclical issued by Pope Leo XIII in 1891 called Rerum Novarum. If you have not yet read it I highly recommend it to you. It is much easier to find then when I first read it. Easily accessible on the Vatican website. It is, in my opinion, a wonderful starting point for the development of a political and economic philosophy that is consistent with the Catholic faith. 

The church being the very conservative  institution it always has been you will read through several pages of the encyclical condemning the evils of socialism. Pope Leo didn&#039;t want anyone to mistakenly think he was endorsing socialism. But then the Pontiff teaches us about the MUTUAL responsibilities of labor and capital. Something that, I&#039;m sorry to say, seems like an alien concept to far too many 21st century Republicans.  The Pope also taught us that it is the proper role of the state to promote social justice through the protection of rights. 

At any rate, it is a real shame that Congressman Ryan didn&#039;t choose from among the many great minds that the Catholic church has produced when looking for a touchstone for the development of his political and economic philosophy. He would have been far better served than by looking to the crackpot philosophy of an atheist writer of mediocre fiction who was openly hostile to the church. Instead of requiring his poor staff to read Rand he might want to pick from among the many Catholic scholars who offer something much more worthwhile for their reading list.

It might also help keep his faith and his politics far more attuned to one another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to consider the possibility that some of the Catholics you attack so casually may be far more in line with the teaching of the Catholic church than Congressman Ryan is. Well meaning though he may be. This may be inconvenient when you are trying to reconcile church teaching with some of your political views, but questioning one&#8217;s own assumptions and motivations is a very healthy thing. And it usually results in a far more honest case being made by the individual going forward. And one that is more persuasive because it is both more honest and more consistent.</p>
<p>I always thought it rather odd for Congressman Ryan (or any Catholic for that matter) to base his economic or political views on the works of Ayn Rand. Not because she was an atheist. Not even because of her open hostility toward the church and religion in general. But because so much of her philosophy is completely antithetical to what the Catholic church teaches us.</p>
<p>As a young man, I read an encyclical issued by Pope Leo XIII in 1891 called Rerum Novarum. If you have not yet read it I highly recommend it to you. It is much easier to find then when I first read it. Easily accessible on the Vatican website. It is, in my opinion, a wonderful starting point for the development of a political and economic philosophy that is consistent with the Catholic faith. </p>
<p>The church being the very conservative  institution it always has been you will read through several pages of the encyclical condemning the evils of socialism. Pope Leo didn&#8217;t want anyone to mistakenly think he was endorsing socialism. But then the Pontiff teaches us about the MUTUAL responsibilities of labor and capital. Something that, I&#8217;m sorry to say, seems like an alien concept to far too many 21st century Republicans.  The Pope also taught us that it is the proper role of the state to promote social justice through the protection of rights. </p>
<p>At any rate, it is a real shame that Congressman Ryan didn&#8217;t choose from among the many great minds that the Catholic church has produced when looking for a touchstone for the development of his political and economic philosophy. He would have been far better served than by looking to the crackpot philosophy of an atheist writer of mediocre fiction who was openly hostile to the church. Instead of requiring his poor staff to read Rand he might want to pick from among the many Catholic scholars who offer something much more worthwhile for their reading list.</p>
<p>It might also help keep his faith and his politics far more attuned to one another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Keynes vs. Hayek Round Two by Alex</title>
		<link>http://shaunkenney.com/2011/04/keynes-vs-hayek-round-two/comment-page-1/#comment-9390</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 08:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaunkenney.com/?p=10122#comment-9390</guid>
		<description>This is a great post. Thank you and &lt;a href=&quot;http://google.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; for chance to read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post. Thank you and <a href="http://google.com/" rel="nofollow">Google</a> for chance to read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should You Donate to Children&#8217;s Wish Foundation?  (I Didn&#8217;t &#8212; Here&#8217;s Why) by Jayme</title>
		<link>http://shaunkenney.com/2011/01/should-you-donate-to-childrens-wish-foundation-i-didnt-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-9380</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 14:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaunkenney.com/?p=9915#comment-9380</guid>
		<description>@Freddie: I know they sound alike, but what else are you going to call it? Its is a legit cause. Its actually slightly better than Make a Wish because the age cap is 21 instead of 15 and there&#039;s no limit of wish category. Make a wish has &#039;categories&#039; they must choose from, which is perfectly fine with me. With Children&#039;s Wish Foundation International they don&#039;t have to fall into a specific category. If the child can dream it, they make it happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Freddie: I know they sound alike, but what else are you going to call it? Its is a legit cause. Its actually slightly better than Make a Wish because the age cap is 21 instead of 15 and there&#8217;s no limit of wish category. Make a wish has &#8216;categories&#8217; they must choose from, which is perfectly fine with me. With Children&#8217;s Wish Foundation International they don&#8217;t have to fall into a specific category. If the child can dream it, they make it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should You Donate to Children&#8217;s Wish Foundation?  (I Didn&#8217;t &#8212; Here&#8217;s Why) by Jayme</title>
		<link>http://shaunkenney.com/2011/01/should-you-donate-to-childrens-wish-foundation-i-didnt-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-9379</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 14:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaunkenney.com/?p=9915#comment-9379</guid>
		<description>@Shaun: We are instructed that if the person giving mistakes us for Make a Wish to correct them.  I&#039;m very clear with my customers that its Children&#039;s Wish. Both are wonderful organizations with just different lists of children.  its simple as that. I will never mislead a customer and thats why the ones I talk to are more than happy to help out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Shaun: We are instructed that if the person giving mistakes us for Make a Wish to correct them.  I&#8217;m very clear with my customers that its Children&#8217;s Wish. Both are wonderful organizations with just different lists of children.  its simple as that. I will never mislead a customer and thats why the ones I talk to are more than happy to help out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should You Donate to Children&#8217;s Wish Foundation?  (I Didn&#8217;t &#8212; Here&#8217;s Why) by Jayme</title>
		<link>http://shaunkenney.com/2011/01/should-you-donate-to-childrens-wish-foundation-i-didnt-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-9378</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 14:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaunkenney.com/?p=9915#comment-9378</guid>
		<description>And ps. the cards you&#039;re getting are general mailers for you to pass on at church or to a friend, they&#039;re not the pledge cards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And ps. the cards you&#8217;re getting are general mailers for you to pass on at church or to a friend, they&#8217;re not the pledge cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should You Donate to Children&#8217;s Wish Foundation?  (I Didn&#8217;t &#8212; Here&#8217;s Why) by Jayme</title>
		<link>http://shaunkenney.com/2011/01/should-you-donate-to-childrens-wish-foundation-i-didnt-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-9377</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 14:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaunkenney.com/?p=9915#comment-9377</guid>
		<description>I actually do this for a living. I am a professional fundraiser who calls for CWF.  Its not a scam. Your wife obviously got a caller who was probably fired later, because the script I read is nothing like that.  they may even have just been running a scam of their own, which is why they require people to destroy their scripts upon being fired or quitting. I work for a reputable company who does the calling for hundreds of non profits so that each one only has to pay one central location to do all their advertising (we do printing, calling, mailing; we run the show for a very low hourly rate which they reimburse us for after all wishes are granted first and foremost).  I provide my customers with the website upon request and give them all of the phone numbers they ask for and even one they don&#039;t ask for just so they have the power to research on their own. The people I call have been giving for years. Sometimes we call people who&#039;ve never giving before and I encourage those who are first time givers to research it on their own and help them have the tools to do so.  I even research every charity I call for and if one doesn&#039;t seem kosher to me, I refuse to call for it.  You are lumping every professional fundraiser in with one bad apple. I get to make a living helping people. Every day I go home knowing I made a difference. I even volunteer for CWF in my spare time b/c I felt like I needed to be able to share more information with my customers.  I&#039;m so sorry that your wife had a bad experience, but we&#039;re not all bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually do this for a living. I am a professional fundraiser who calls for CWF.  Its not a scam. Your wife obviously got a caller who was probably fired later, because the script I read is nothing like that.  they may even have just been running a scam of their own, which is why they require people to destroy their scripts upon being fired or quitting. I work for a reputable company who does the calling for hundreds of non profits so that each one only has to pay one central location to do all their advertising (we do printing, calling, mailing; we run the show for a very low hourly rate which they reimburse us for after all wishes are granted first and foremost).  I provide my customers with the website upon request and give them all of the phone numbers they ask for and even one they don&#8217;t ask for just so they have the power to research on their own. The people I call have been giving for years. Sometimes we call people who&#8217;ve never giving before and I encourage those who are first time givers to research it on their own and help them have the tools to do so.  I even research every charity I call for and if one doesn&#8217;t seem kosher to me, I refuse to call for it.  You are lumping every professional fundraiser in with one bad apple. I get to make a living helping people. Every day I go home knowing I made a difference. I even volunteer for CWF in my spare time b/c I felt like I needed to be able to share more information with my customers.  I&#8217;m so sorry that your wife had a bad experience, but we&#8217;re not all bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jefferson and Liberty by James Renwick Manship, Sr.</title>
		<link>http://shaunkenney.com/2012/04/jefferson-and-liberty/comment-page-1/#comment-9364</link>
		<dc:creator>James Renwick Manship, Sr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaunkenney.com/?p=10297#comment-9364</guid>
		<description>Thank you Shaun for helping modern Americans remember our blessed past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Shaun for helping modern Americans remember our blessed past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

