ShaunKenney.com / 3,278 posts / categories / 4,042 comments / feed / comments feed

Shannon Attacks Cuccinelli on Confession?!

I’ve long railed against the anti-Catholicism that runs ever so close to the surface in Virginia politics.  Sometimes it bubbles up, and in Steve Shannon’s failing campaign to be the next Attorney General of Virginia, it just came to the forefront.

Case in point, his last-ditch attack ad against Ken Cuccinelli:

See that line: “Against Requiring Clergy to Report Child Molestation”? The bill? SB 314 on third reading, 01/29/2004.  Go ahead, check it out yourself.

That bill passed 22-17 in the Senate and was killed in House Committee by a vote of 10-12. The problem with the bill isn’t just the fact that federal courts have upheld the “seal of confession” for Catholic priests, the problem is that the attack on Cuccinelli just ain’t true.

Don’t believe me? Read the amendment Cuccinelli offered in the Senate:

D. Any regular minister, priest, rabbi or duly accredited practitioner over the age of 18 years of any religious organization or denomination usually referred to as a church who has reason to suspect that a child has been abused or neglected by another regular minister, priest, rabbi or duly accredited practitioner shall report the matter immediately to the local department or to the Department’s toll-free child abuse and neglect hotline in accordance with the provisions of subsection A. This subsection shall not apply to (i) information required by the doctrine of the religious organization or denomination to be kept in a confidential manner or (ii) information that would be subject to § 8.01-400 or § 19.2-271.3 if offered as evidence in court.

What this amendment allowed was a process that would permit the suspicion of child abuse to be reported by clergy that would not break the seal of confession in the instance of Catholic priests.  Not only did Cuccinelli remain sensitive to the “seal of confession” — he refused to let it end there and moved legislatively to correct any sort of loophole, thus requiring clergy to report instances of child abuse and neglect.  Did these facts sway Shannon?  Not a bit… but they sure do make for great political cannon fodder for those who refuse to read the bill or the debate that ensued.

Here’s the kicker:  This anti-Catholic attack ad comes just days after Steve Shannon refused to fill out the Virginia Catholic Conference survey — joining the Deeds, Wagner, and 40 other state Democrats who tossed aside the questionnaire.

Anti-Catholic hate?  I see it, and 642,000 other Catholic Virginians tired of being kicked are seeing it too.

7 Comments

  1. Rick Sincere — 20 October 2009 #

    Perhaps Ken Cuccinelli is under the protection of St. John Nepomucene.

  2. Shaun Kenney — 20 October 2009 #

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_Nepomuk

    I have to confess, I had to look that up. That’s confidential though… right?

  3. Rob Vaughn — 20 October 2009 #

    The bill Cuccinelli voted against in 2004 was not about abuse by a cleric but abuse by anyone and already carried the provision that if one’s denominational polity prohibited reporting, the clergyperson would be exempt. The language is the same in the last sentance of the amendment you referenced above. I don’t understand how that action is anit-Catholic. Fortunately another version emerged in 2006 that Cuccinelli did support.

  4. Rick Sincere — 20 October 2009 #

    As long as you’re confessing, Shaun, my lips are sealed.

  5. connie — 20 October 2009 #

    LOL. I think Shannon is Catholic. Is he bashing himself as well?

  6. connie — 20 October 2009 #

    Yep, according to a Google search that turned up his myspace account, Steve Shannon is Catholic. So it’d ridiculous to accuse him of anti-Catholicism.

  7. jason — 24 October 2009 #

    The Catholic Church is a big church — some of the most virulent anti-Catholics are folks who claim the title but understand nothing of what (or why) the Church believes as it does.

Leave a comment