Vatican Raises the Ante on Israel

enter site follow url https://hobcawbarony.org/coursework/ap-english-synthesis-essay-template-pdf/27/ go proventil inhaler dosage lasix side effects infants go to link jude the obscure research paper viagra con la pressione alta take synthroid essays on how to stay healthy http://kanack.org/statement/pros-and-cons-of-foreign-aid-essay/26/ https://ncappa.org/term/dissertation-powerpoint-presentation-templates/4/ amoxicilina clavulanico 500 125 mg comprimidos viagra best masters essay editing for hire online source site kamagra shop deutschland bewertungen a2b galvani female viagra https://thembl.org/masters/watching-soap-operas-essay/60/ good essay writing service enter site who am i essays examples definition methodology in research go site https://tffa.org/businessplan/thesis-on-a-homicide-izle/70/ alternative viagra senza ricetta 9 11 essay ideas for imagination https://hobcawbarony.org/coursework/5-year-career-goal-essay-for-nursing/27/ sampels of scholarship essays eap orlistat uk fake zithromax 500mg https://elkhartcivictheatre.org/proposal/research-topics-for-paper/3/ Been keeping an eye on the Vatican-Israeli tit-for-tat going on over the past few days. Pope Benedict XVI issued a condemnation of terror attacks in Egypt and mentioned a list of nations affected by terrorism. He did not mention Israel, in which the Israeli embassy sent a blistering condemnation to the Vatican ambassador, as well as taking their outrage to the public.

Now honestly, the omission wasn’t deliberate. Could not have been. Israel already suffers a tremendous amount of terror attacks, but rarely do you hear of such a wide-ranging offensive in places such as Egypt and London. In short, the Israelis are playing the card of diplomatic hypersensitivity to use as leverage against the Vatican during negotiations — especially concerning the status of the holy sites and the construction of the West Bank wall. So Israel threw what is tantamount to a diplomatic temper-tantrum, and the Vatican watched silently.

Until now. In response to the Israeli showdown, Vatican diplomats have fired few shots across the bow, just to bring some perspective into the conversation:

‘It’s not always possible to immediately follow every attack against Israel with a public statement of condemnation,’ a statement from the Vatican press office said Thursday night, ‘and (that is) for various reasons, among them the fact that the attacks against Israel sometimes were followed by immediate Israeli reactions not always compatible with the rules of international law.’

‘It would thus be impossible to condemn the first (the terror strikes) and let the second (Israeli retaliation) pass in silence,’ said the statement, which had an unusually blistering tone for the Holy See.

The Israeli Foreign Ministry refused to comment on the Vatican statement.

In other words, the Israelis got the point. When you build barriers through Christian holy sites, when you shoot up the car carrying Bishop Marcuzzo (even when it was flying the Vatican flag), when you bomb out Palestinian police barracks in response to HAMAS terror attacks, one should reasonably expect a rather short leash when it comes to being able to claim a grieved status on terrorism.

Whether the Likud government wants a full-scale PR discussion on how Christians are treated in Israel is another story altogether. Personally, I don’t think they relish the idea, and for good reason.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.